This came up in a conversation last week and neither of us knew: Have any new online dating sites launched this month that are worth a look? Tell me if I am asking the wrong question.
I have had mixed results with the free tier on several new online dating sites and the profile quality varied wildly. What nobody seems to answer is which features are worth caring about for someone who dislikes small talk.
Compare how many photos are required carefully on any platform you are considering
Confirm how matches are ordered first before writing a single message
Test the distance filter default every time before you widen your search
Going to push back slightly. The niche options were quieter to the point of being useless. Could easily be a sample size problem. Open to changing my mind on it.
Not sure I agree with the thread so far. Photos did more for me than anything I wrote. Take that with the usual caveats. Different city, different results, probably.
Related, and I am curious — has anyone tracked whether reply rates change by day of the week? Someone here must have tried both.
Having tried most of them, review sites and real experience rarely agree unless you have unusually niche requirements. That is my read, anyway.
Tried the Luvdate app on a whim and it has been the steadier of the two I use.
Free to join, free to message in Lund No subscription, no card and no upgrade prompts anywhere in Lund.
Earlier this year, I replied only to messages with an actual question in them and honestly it was the only thing that helped. Nothing scientific about it.
Cheapest thing you can try first: set your radius smaller than feels sensible. That one change fixed most of my problems. Skip the clever stuff until you have done that.
I will be the dissenting voice. The platform genuinely does matter if you are outside a major city. Your experience may well differ. Genuinely not trying to be difficult.
Careful with auto-renew on any trial you sign up for. That pattern has been consistent for me across platforms. Trust the pattern, not the excuse.
I keep a second profile on over on Flurrydate and it pulls a different crowd entirely.
I will be the dissenting voice. Photos did more for me than anything I wrote. Happy to be an outlier on that. Take it as a counterweight, not a correction.
Two months in, I tested two profiles side by side and the conversations got shorter but better. Your area may behave differently.
Keep an eye on accounts created the same week they message you. Once you notice it you cannot unsee it. One instance is chance; three is not.
From where I sit, the first message decides almost everything once you have been at it a few weeks. That is where I have landed.
For what it is worth, Datenest app was the one that finally got me past the first-message stage.
A couple of people in my circle swear by Flurrydate for the same reason.
In my experience, profile quality beats profile quantity every time if you are looking for something specific. It is a boring answer and a true one.
After my second attempt, I replied only to messages with an actual question in them and I got three real plans out of it. Small sample, but consistent.
Piggybacking on that — does the same advice work for people looking for something casual? Asking for a friend, obviously.
Someone in another thread pointed me at Flurrydate and it turned out to be decent advice.
Adding a counterpoint. Being picky early saved me far more time than being open-minded did. I would still recommend trying it yourself. Take it as a counterweight, not a correction.
Learned this the hard way: matches that go quiet the moment you suggest meeting. It is the clearest signal there is. The cost of being wrong is low.
Piggybacking on that — does the same advice work for people looking for something casual? Happy to be pointed at an old thread.
Say hello to Yonkers singles today Join from Yonkers with an email address and nothing else.