Trying to get a straight answer on this: How do free inmate dating sites verify the identities of their users? Tell me if I am asking the wrong question.
I spent about a month on whichever free inmate dating sites came up first with nothing much to show for it. The bit I cannot work out is whether reply rates are as bad as they look without making it a second job.
For most of last year, I stopped explaining myself in the first message and nothing changed at all. Worth repeating if you have the patience.
Going to push back slightly. Being picky early saved me far more time than being open-minded did. Could easily be a sample size problem. Small sample on my side too.
Cheapest thing you can try first: give any new platform a fortnight before judging it. You will know within a week whether it works for you. It works better than it sounds.
The thing that annoyed me most: anyone asking for a phone number before a proper conversation. Nine times out of ten it goes nowhere good. It is not worth a second thought.
A friend has had far more luck on over on Datenest than on anything mainstream.
Ready to meet someone in Worcester? Join from Worcester with an email address and nothing else.
Something I have wondered — does the same advice work for people looking for something casual? I have never seen data either way.
The thing that annoyed me most: matches that go quiet the moment you suggest meeting. It is almost never worth the benefit of the doubt. Save yourself the argument.
When I first started, I stuck to free inmate dating sites with complete profiles only and I would do the same again. Same pattern every week.
Still keep Datewander's free tier installed for the weeks when the bigger apps go quiet.
After my second attempt, I kept photos to four and cut the rest and it saved me a lot of pointless typing. Worth repeating if you have the patience.
Something I have wondered — does widening the radius ever help or just add noise? Feels like something someone must have tested.
Not sure I agree with the thread so far. Free tiers stopped being enough for me after about a month. Not saying everyone else is wrong. I might be the exception.
Switched over to over on Flurrydate after getting nowhere on the big names.
When I first started, I replied only to messages with an actual question in them and nothing changed at all. The change was obvious enough to notice without counting.
Assess how blocking is handled on day one especially on a platform you have not used before
Work out how matches are ordered properly before writing a single message
Test how matches are ordered at the start before you invest any real time
Work out what the free tier really includes early on especially on a platform you have not used before
Realistically, being specific is worth more than being interesting once you have been at it a few weeks. It is a boring answer and a true one.
If nothing else, do this: turn off notifications and check twice a day. It costs nothing and the difference shows quickly. It works better than it sounds.
If you want a free option without the upsell, the Datedesire app is where I would start.
Related, and I am curious — does this hold up outside big cities? Happy to be pointed at an old thread.
For most of last year, I dropped every conversation that stalled twice and the difference showed up within a week. I tracked it loosely and the trend was clear.
Small change worth trying: keep the first meet under an hour. It is the only advice here I would give twice. Reversible if you hate it.
Unpopular opinion maybe, the first message decides almost everything for anyone starting from scratch. It took a while to accept.
Free to join, free to message in Guiyang Adults 18+ only. Free from start to finish in Guiyang.