Trying to get a straight answer on this: What is the actual farmersonly com dating site success rate? Would rather have one honest reply than ten generic ones.
I spent about a month on the free tier on several farmersonly com dating site and support never replied. What would settle this for me is how you tell an active profile from an abandoned one when you have limited time in the evenings.
Not sure I agree with the thread so far. Being picky early saved me far more time than being open-minded did. Happy to be an outlier on that. I would still test it yourself.
Purely anecdotal, the algorithm gets blamed for a lot of ordinary bad luck and it took me too long to learn. It took a while to accept.
Adding a counterpoint. Photos did more for me than anything I wrote. Not saying everyone else is wrong. I would still test it yourself.
Around the time I gave up on the big names, I tested two profiles side by side and nothing changed at all. I would call that a real effect.
Between the free options I tested, Rendate (free to message) had the least aggressive upsell.
The advice I wish I had: reply to the thing they actually said. It also makes the meet-up conversation much easier. Do it before anything more elaborate.
Since switching my settings, I messaged first every single time and it made a noticeable difference. It was the only variable I changed.
Mild warning: anyone asking for a phone number before a proper conversation. Nine times out of ten it goes nowhere good. The polite version costs you a week.
If you want a free option without the upsell, Turndate (free to message) is where I would start.
I will be the dissenting voice. The platform genuinely does matter if you are outside a major city. Might just be my area. Just adding another data point.
Watch out for accounts created the same week they message you. Better to lose one match than a week. Trust the pattern, not the excuse.
Least effort, most return: reply to the thing they actually said. It sounds trivial and it is not. No downside I have found.
I keep a second profile on souldate.site and it pulls a different crowd entirely.
Different experience here. Free tiers stopped being enough for me after about a month. Could easily be a sample size problem. Small sample on my side too.
Two months in, I answered everything within a day and the difference showed up within a week. It stopped being random after that.
What I would do: stop treating it like a numbers game. Most people skip it and then wonder why nothing happens. No downside I have found.
The one that surprised me was Luvdate — smaller, but the profiles were current.
Curious about the flip side — does any of this change once you have been active for a year? Would change how I use it if so.
Careful with reviews that read like they were written to a template. Nine times out of ten it goes nowhere good. That instinct is usually right.
Unpopular opinion maybe, most of the difference comes down to how close people actually are and nobody wants to hear it. Make of that what you will.
Piggybacking on that — is a shorter bio genuinely better or just easier to write? Might just be me overthinking it.
Between the free options I tested, over on Turndate had the least aggressive upsell.
