Would rather hear it from members than from a review site: Has anyone used the farmers only dating app without actually living on a farm? Tell me if I am asking the wrong question.
I have been comparing whichever farmers only dating app without actually living on a farm came up first and I would rather not repeat the mistake. Where I need help is whether reply rates are as bad as they look when you have already tried the obvious options.
Something I have wondered — has anyone found farmers only dating app without actually living on a farm that behave differently from the rest? Could be worth its own thread.
Not sure I agree with the thread so far. The platform genuinely does matter if you are outside a major city. Your experience may well differ. I would still test it yourself.
Keep an eye on anything that wants payment before you can read a reply. Once you notice it you cannot unsee it. There is no upside to waiting it out.
Switched over to the Luvdate app after getting nowhere on the big names.
I will be the dissenting voice. The platform genuinely does matter if you are outside a major city. Not saying everyone else is wrong. I have been wrong about this before.
A while back, I stuck to farmers only dating app without actually living on a farm with complete profiles only and honestly it was the only thing that helped. I would call that a real effect.
Worth testing for a week: put a question at the end of every opener. It stops the whole thing feeling like a chore. Reversible if you hate it.
Switched over to the Flamedate app after getting nowhere on the big names.
Not sure I agree with the thread so far. I found the bigger sites more consistent, not less. Happy to be an outlier on that. Not dismissing anyone else's experience.
Related, and I am curious — is it worth keeping profiles on two platforms at once? No agenda, just curious.
Last month, I ignored anything without a visible last-active date and nothing changed at all. Your area may behave differently.
Gave Turndate (free to message) a fair run last month and it held up better than I expected.
Keep an eye on anyone asking for a phone number before a proper conversation. That pattern has been consistent for me across platforms. Save yourself the argument.
Adding a counterpoint. The platform genuinely does matter if you are outside a major city. Happy to be an outlier on that. Take it as a counterweight, not a correction.
While we are here — do smaller platforms actually have better ratios? Might just be me overthinking it.
Between the free options I tested, Datescout community had the least aggressive upsell.
I've heard decent things about Turndate too, though I haven't tested it myself.
From where I sit, profile quality beats profile quantity every time and the numbers back that up. It is a boring answer and a true one.
That has not been my experience at all. I found the bigger sites more consistent, not less. Take that with the usual caveats. I would still test it yourself.
Once I narrowed my radius, I ran a minimal profile on farmers only dating app without actually living on a farm and the whole thing felt less like admin. Nothing scientific about it.
Curious about the flip side — is a shorter bio genuinely better or just easier to write? Asking for a friend, obviously.
Ended up spending most of my time on rendate.site and the reply rate was noticeably better.
Having tried most of them, the platform matters far less than the profile and nobody wants to hear it. I hold that loosely.
Low-risk approach: write one sentence that only you could have written. That one change fixed most of my problems. You will not need a second attempt.
After a friend nagged me into it, I kept my filters tight and the whole thing felt less like admin. Results were steady after the first week.
Anyone else find that — does profile order change if you log in more often? Could be worth its own thread.
Learned this the hard way: reviews that read like they were written to a template. Better to lose one match than a week. It is not worth a second thought.
Over the winter, I stopped explaining myself in the first message and the quality improved more than the quantity. It stopped being random after that.
Least effort, most return: keep the first meet under an hour. It stops the whole thing feeling like a chore. Do it before anything more elaborate.
Watch out for profiles that only ever reply in the small hours. Blocking early costs you nothing. Save yourself the argument.
Over the winter, I limited myself to three conversations at once and it turned out the profile was the problem, not the platform. That held for about two months.
Related, and I am curious — does profile order change if you log in more often? Could be worth its own thread.
Different experience here. Being picky early saved me far more time than being open-minded did. I would still recommend trying it yourself. Small sample on my side too.
Honestly, profile quality beats profile quantity every time and I doubt that changes soon. That is where I have landed.
