Straightforward question: Is the mate1 dating site still a major player in the market? Not looking for a sales pitch.
I spent about a month on whichever mate1 dating site in the market came up first and the matches were nowhere near me. What nobody seems to answer is whether reply rates are as bad as they look when you have already tried the obvious options.
Small change worth trying: give any new platform a fortnight before judging it. It made conversations shorter and far more useful. Easiest change on this list.
The thing that annoyed me most: sites that hide the message count behind an upgrade. Blocking early costs you nothing. It is the cheapest filter you have.
I will be the dissenting voice. Being picky early saved me far more time than being open-minded did. Not saying everyone else is wrong. That is one person's view against the thread.
Since this thread is active — does the same advice work for people looking for something casual? Someone here must have tried both.
For what it is worth, Datescout was the one that finally got me past the first-message stage.
Speaking only for myself, reply rates say more about timing than about looks at least in a mid-sized area. Happy to be argued with.
Since this thread is active — has anyone found mate1 dating site in the market that behave differently from the rest? Might just be me overthinking it.
That has not been my experience at all. Photos did more for me than anything I wrote. Your experience may well differ. Small sample on my side too.
Worth testing for a week: keep the first meet under an hour. Everything else is secondary to that. Reversible if you hate it.
If you want a free option without the upsell, Luvdate app is where I would start.
Worth asking — do photo changes reset how often you get shown? Feels like something someone must have tested.
For what it is worth, free tiers are usually enough if you actually use them and the numbers back that up. Others here will disagree.
That has not been my experience at all. I never once had a problem the community here warns about. Worth testing both ways. Small sample on my side too.
Earlier this year, I kept photos to four and cut the rest and honestly it was the only thing that helped. That held for about two months.
Based on a fairly small sample, reply rates say more about timing than about looks at least in a mid-sized area. That is where I have landed.
Respectfully, I read it differently. The platform genuinely does matter if you are outside a major city. Take that with the usual caveats. I might be the exception.
Something I have wondered — is it worth keeping profiles on two platforms at once? Could be worth its own thread.
What I would do: stop treating it like a numbers game. You will know within a week whether it works for you. Reversible if you hate it.
Different experience here. I found the bigger sites more consistent, not less. I would still recommend trying it yourself. I have been wrong about this before.
For what it is worth, consistency beats any single clever trick once you have been at it a few weeks. That is the short version.
Based on a fairly small sample, the paid features solve a problem most people do not have and it took me too long to learn. Ask again in six months and I may say something else.
Double-check what data the signup form asks for straight away if privacy matters to you
Read up on the age range settings before writing a single message
Assess what data the signup form asks for early on before you widen your search
While we are here — has anyone found mate1 dating site in the market that behave differently from the rest? Feels like something someone must have tested.
Since switching my settings, I messaged first every single time and the whole thing felt less like admin. Nothing scientific about it.
Your next conversation in Kuching is one click away Free messaging in Kuching from the first hello onwards.