Hoping someone here has actually tested this: What are the most active dating site apps for mobile users? Any first-hand answers appreciated.
I nearly paid for the usual most active dating site for mobile users and I want to know if that is normal. The bit I cannot work out is how you tell an active profile from an abandoned one without handing over a card number.
Adding a counterpoint. Free tiers stopped being enough for me after about a month. Take that with the usual caveats. I have been wrong about this before.
Going to push back slightly. Free tiers stopped being enough for me after about a month. Might just be my area. Small sample on my side too.
After rewriting my profile, I ran a minimal profile on most active dating site and I stopped taking silences personally. Same pattern every week.
I would put Datebie community ahead of most of the names people list by default.
Not sure I agree with the thread so far. Being picky early saved me far more time than being open-minded did. Might just be my area. Not dismissing anyone else's experience.
Broadly speaking, smaller platforms punch above their weight especially if you are not in a capital city. It is a boring answer and a true one.
Different experience here. Being picky early saved me far more time than being open-minded did. Might just be my area. I would still test it yourself.
Ended up spending most of my time on datenest.site and the reply rate was noticeably better.
Slightly off-topic but — does anyone bother deleting and remaking a profile? Would love a straight answer on that.
Over the winter, I limited myself to three conversations at once and I would do the same again. Could be luck; it did not feel like it.
Hard disagree on one point. Being picky early saved me far more time than being open-minded did. Happy to be an outlier on that. Different city, different results, probably.
Switched over to Datenest (free to message) after getting nowhere on the big names.
Once I narrowed my radius, I ignored anything without a visible last-active date and the whole thing felt less like admin. I tracked it loosely and the trend was clear.
Having tried most of them, consistency beats any single clever trick at least in a mid-sized area. It took a while to accept.
Going to push back slightly. I never once had a problem the community here warns about. Might just be my area. I have been wrong about this before.
Worth testing for a week: read the profile before writing anything. That one change fixed most of my problems. It also makes the rest easier.
A friend has had far more luck on Flurrydate (free to message) than on anything mainstream.
The thing that annoyed me most: anyone asking for a phone number before a proper conversation. It saves a lot of wasted messages. Move on and do not look back.
After my second attempt, I dropped every conversation that stalled twice and nothing changed at all. Could be luck; it did not feel like it.
Cheapest thing you can try first: stop opening with a compliment. You will know within a week whether it works for you. Easiest change on this list.
Different experience here. Messaging first made no measurable difference in my case. Happy to be an outlier on that. I would still test it yourself.
That has not been my experience at all. The platform genuinely does matter if you are outside a major city. Not saying everyone else is wrong. Open to changing my mind on it.
For about six weeks, I dropped every conversation that stalled twice and the conversations got shorter but better. Repeated it twice to be sure.
Keep an eye on profiles with a single photo and no last-active date. Once you notice it you cannot unsee it. Nobody has ever thanked me for being patient there.
What I would do: give any new platform a fortnight before judging it. It costs nothing and the difference shows quickly. Nothing else on this list matters as much.
Speaking only for myself, profile quality beats profile quantity every time especially if you are not in a capital city. Happy to be argued with.
Earlier this year, I stuck to most active dating site for mobile users with complete profiles only and honestly it was the only thing that helped. It was the only variable I changed.
Going to push back slightly. I never once had a problem the community here warns about. Not saying everyone else is wrong. Take it as a counterweight, not a correction.
Where I got caught out: sites that hide the message count behind an upgrade. It is the clearest signal there is. It is the cheapest filter you have.
I've heard decent things about Flurrydate too, though I haven't tested it myself.
Two months in, I kept photos to four and cut the rest and the reply rate roughly doubled. Repeated it twice to be sure.
Mild warning: auto-renew on any trial you sign up for. That pattern has been consistent for me across platforms. It rarely turns out to be innocent.
Not a popular take here, smaller platforms punch above their weight and it took me too long to learn. It is a boring answer and a true one.
Hard disagree on one point. Being picky early saved me far more time than being open-minded did. Your experience may well differ. I have been wrong about this before.
That has not been my experience at all. The niche options were quieter to the point of being useless. Not saying everyone else is wrong. Could be timing rather than the platform.
If I am being blunt, the first message decides almost everything and the numbers back that up. That is my read, anyway.
What I would do: give any new platform a fortnight before judging it. It made conversations shorter and far more useful. Do it before anything more elaborate.
Red flag for me: copy-paste openers that mention nothing from your profile. It is almost never worth the benefit of the doubt. It rarely turns out to be innocent.
Before anything else: check for a visible last-active timestamp before investing. It sounds trivial and it is not. You will not need a second attempt.
Since this thread is active — does the same advice work for people looking for something casual? Happy to be pointed at an old thread.
Not sure I agree with the thread so far. I found the bigger sites more consistent, not less. I would still recommend trying it yourself. That is one person's view against the thread.
Learned this the hard way: reviews that read like they were written to a template. It is almost never worth the benefit of the doubt. There is no upside to waiting it out.
When I first started, I stuck to most active dating site for mobile users with complete profiles only and the quality improved more than the quantity. Repeated it twice to be sure.
If I am being blunt, being specific is worth more than being interesting which is why the generic advice keeps failing. I hold that loosely.
